Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 667-678, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-762093

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate how type I diabetes mellitus (T1D) affects the folliculogenesis and oocyte development, fertilization, and embryo development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative animal study was conducted using two different mouse models of T1D, a genetic AKITA model and a streptozotocin-induced diabetes model. Ovarian function was assessed by gross observation, immunoblot, immunohistochemistry, oocyte counting, and ELISA for serum hormones (insulin, anti-Mullerian hormone, estradiol, testosterone, and progesterone). Maturation and developmental competence of metaphase II oocytes from control and T1D animals was evaluated by immunofluorescent and immunohistochemical detection of biomarkers and in vitro fertilization. RESULTS: Animals from both T1D models showed increased blood glucose levels, while only streptozotocin (STZ)-injected mice showed reduced body weight. Folliculogenesis, oogenesis, and preimplantation embryogenesis were impaired in both T1D mouse models. Interestingly, exogenous streptozotocin injection to induce T1D led to marked decreases in ovary size, expression of luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor in the ovaries, the number of corpora lutea per ovary, oocyte maturation, and serum progesterone levels. Both T1D models exhibited significantly reduced pre-implantation embryo quality compared with controls. There was no significant difference in embryo quality between STZ-injected and AKITA diabetic mice. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that T1D affects folliculogenesis, oogenesis, and embryo development in mice. However, the physiological mechanisms underlying the observed reproductive effects of diabetes need to be further investigated.


Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Female , Humans , Mice , Pregnancy , Anti-Mullerian Hormone , Biomarkers , Blood Glucose , Body Weight , Corpus Luteum , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Embryonic Development , Embryonic Structures , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Estradiol , Fertility , Fertilization , Fertilization in Vitro , Gonadotropins , Immunohistochemistry , Lutein , Mental Competency , Metaphase , Oocytes , Oogenesis , Ovary , Progesterone , Reproduction , Streptozocin , Testosterone
2.
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ; : e35-2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-213440

ABSTRACT

No abstract available.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Ovary , Uterus
3.
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ; : e22-2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-100618

ABSTRACT

As the number of young cancer survivors increases, quality of life after cancer treatment is becoming an ever more important consideration. According to a report from the American Cancer Society, approximately 810,170 women were diagnosed with cancer in 2015 in the United States. Among female cancer survivors, 1 in 250 are of reproductive age. Anticancer therapies can result in infertility or sterility and can have long-term negative effects on bone health, cardiovascular health as a result of reproductive endocrine function. Fertility preservation has been identified by many young patients diagnosed with cancer as second only to survival in terms of importance. The development of fertility preservation technologies aims to help patients diagnosed with cancer to preserve or protect their fertility prior to exposure to chemo- or radiation therapy, thus improving their chances of having a family and enhancing their quality of life as a cancer survivor. Currently, sperm, egg, and embryo banking are standard of care for preserving fertility for reproductive-age cancer patients; ovarian tissue cryopreservation is still considered experimental. Adoption and surrogate may also need to be considered. All patients should receive information about the fertility risks associated with their cancer treatment and the fertility preservation options available in a timely manner, whether or not they decide to ultimately pursue fertility preservation. Because of the ever expanding number of options for treating cancer and preserving fertility, there is now an opportunity to take a precision medicine approach to informing patients about the fertility risks associated with their cancer treatment and the fertility preservation options that are available to them.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Adult Stem Cells , Cell Culture Techniques , Cryopreservation/methods , Embryo, Mammalian , Fertility Preservation/methods , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Oocytes , Ovarian Follicle/drug effects , Ovary/transplantation , Ovulation Induction/methods , Precision Medicine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL